7 restaurants failed Pima County health inspections in January
- Updated
Seven restaurants failed January inspections by the Pima County Health Department. Six have passed follow-up inspections, one failed re-inspection and a follow-up visit is scheduled.ÌýDecember and November inspections included.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
From January
History:ÌýSince 2012, the convenience store chain’s location has receivedÌýÌýthree excellent ratings and one needs improvement rating. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector observed seven priority violations, including several problems with hand sinks, food held at potentially unsafe temperatures, and foods without adequate date marking.
Follow-up:ÌýThe location passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 17.
Response:ÌýA Circle K spokeswoman told the Star that all issues have been addressed with store employees and the facilities department.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
From January
History:ÌýSince 2013, the hotel’s restaurant hasÌýÌýreceived inspection ratings of good and excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýOn a follow-up to a previous needs-improvement inspection, the inspector found that while the walk-in refrigerator had been repaired, there were still no consumer advisories in menus, resulting in the failed rating.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 19.
Response:ÌýManager Tim Heim told the Star that “we never really had the fail,†and that the remaining consumer advisory issue was resolved promptly.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
From January
History:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the hotel hasÌýÌýreceived inspection ratings of good and excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýOn a follow-up to a previous needs-improvement inspection, the inspector found that the location still had not obtained sanitizer test strips, resulting in the failed inspection. The other issue, a high-temperature dishwasher being without a proper thermometer, was resolved.
Follow-up:ÌýThe hotel passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 19.
Response:ÌýA message left for the manager was not returned by press time.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
From January
History:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the restaurant hasÌýÌýreceived inspection ratings of good and excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector observed seven priority violations, including an employee handling raw beef and then handling ready-to-eat food before washingÌýhis or her hands, chicken kept at unsafe temperatures, no date marking on some foods, and no food thermometer on the premises.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 24.
Response:ÌýThe restaurant could not be reached at the number available online.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
From January
History:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the theater has received ratings of excellent almost exclusively, though it has received one previous needs improvement and two good ratings.
What the inspector saw:ÌýDuring the Jan. 18 inspection, the inspector found two priority violations, including the absence of a required hand sink in the dish washing area. That issue had not been resolved by the follow-up inspection on Jan. 30, resulting in the failed inspection. The report notes that a plumber has been hired for the work.
Follow-up:ÌýA follow-up is scheduled for Feb. 9.
Response:ÌýAn employee told the Star that a manager would not be available until after press time.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
From January
History:ÌýSince 2012, the charter school has exclusively received inspection ratings of excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýDuring a Dec. 12 inspection, the inspector found that the steam-table unit was not keeping foods adequately heated and there was no food thermometer on the premises. During a follow-up nearly a month later, the inspector found that the steam table had not been repaired and only one of five slots was functioning properly, and no food thermometer had been acquired, resulting in the failed rating.
Follow-up:ÌýThe school passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 17.
Response:ÌýPrincipal Paul Bummer said that staff had initially tried to fix the steamer, whichÌýÌýdid not resolve the issue. The school ended up buying a brand new one, along with a food thermometer. “We take this matter seriously,†Bummer added.
- By Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
The Carondelet St. Joseph’s cafeteria failed a recent health inspection as a result of a faulty refrigerator.
On Jan. 17, a county inspector found that one of several refrigerators at the east side hospital was not keeping foods sufficiently cool. Normally, five priority violations are required to receive a failing “probationary†rating, but in this case the inspector pointed to the cafeteria’s “pattern of non-compliance†in its report.
That means the county has found at least three instances of comparable violations in recent inspections.
The refrigerator in question was removed from service and “all other areas surveyed during this inspection were found to be rated good or excellent,†according to a statement provided by a Carondelet spokeswoman.
“Carondelet St. Joseph’s Hospital takes every effort to ensure quality and safety in all aspects of the care and service that is provided,†the statement read.
It has since passed re-inspection.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
4,836 - Food service licenses in Pima County
561 - Excellent and good inspections
26 - Needs improvement inspections
7 - Probationary and failed inspections
Source: Pima County Health Department
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
From December
History:ÌýSince 2000, the chain’s location has received almostÌýonly good and excellent inspection ratings. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýWhile the restaurant did not exceed the five priority violation threshold typically used to give probationary ratings, the restaurant has had repeated issues with regulations regarding the cleaning and sanitizing of so-called food contact surfaces. This time around, the inspector found that aÌýÌýmajorityÌýof kitchenwares stored as clean were “encrusted with food debris†and that the sanitizing dishwasher was not functioning properly. In the location’s past five inspections, there have been three comparable violations, establishing what the health department considers aÌýpattern of non-conformance,Ìýaccording to an inspection report provided to the Star. Additionally, the inspector observed an employee “eating a piece of food off of a customer’s order before putting the order up to be collected by wait staff,†another “handling raw hamburger†before touching ready-to-eat foods, and raw chicken thawing at room temperature on a countertop.
Follow-up:ÌýThere was no indication that a follow-up had been conducted by the Star’s deadline.
Response:ÌýIn written comments provided to the Star, a company spokesperson said that “The health of our guests and team members is always our top priority. We have put together a corrective and preventative action plan and are working closely with the health department to ensure all concerns are addressed.â€
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
ÌýIn December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince 2014, this location has received one excellent and three good inspection ratings. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector found six priority violations, including an ice shaver being stored and used on the “dirty side†of a three compartment sink, food preparation equipment with encrusted food debris, condensed milk stored at room temperature, no food thermometer on site and medicine stored near food preparation areas. Several were corrected on site.
Follow-up:ÌýThe location passed a Dec. 20 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýNo one responded to a message seeking comment by deadline.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
ÌýIn December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the location hasÌýÌýreceived inspection ratings of good or excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector observed nine priority violations, including picking up utensils from the floor and returning to food preparation without washing hands, among other hand-washing violations; using hand-washing sink for cooking water and washing floor mats; refried beans kept above safe temperatures and an inadequate dishwashing sink.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant passed a Dec. 22 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýNo one responded to a message seeking comment by deadline.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
ÌýIn December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince 2011 the restaurant has largely received inspection ratings of good, though it has also failed an additional inspection and received two needs improvement ratings.
What the inspector saw:ÌýOnly one priority violation was observed, but because the same problem with keeping foods adequately cooled was found during two other 2016 inspections, the restaurant received a probationary rating for itsÌýhistory of noncompliance,Ìýaccording to the inspection report.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant failed a Dec. 27 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýNo one responded to a message seeking comment by deadline.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
In December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince 2015, the restaurant has had a mixed record, earning an excellent, good and needs improvement inspection rating. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector observed eight priority violations, including an employee washing his hands in the food-preparation sink, an employee sweeping the floor and then proceeding to chop cabbage without washing his hands, equipment with encrusted food debris stored as clean, inadequate cooling and date-marking of food and chopped cabbage being stored inÌýdirty cardboard boxes.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant passed a Dec. 30 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýNo one responded to a message seeking comment by deadline.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
ÌýIn December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the location hasÌýÌýreceived ratings of good and excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector found five priority violations, including a hand-washing station with no paper towels, a walk-in cooler not keeping contents adequately cooled, no food thermometer on site, and inadequate coffee pot cleaning practices.
Follow-up:ÌýThe station passed a Jan. 3 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýIn an email, a spokesperson for Circle K, the permit holder, told the Star: “This is not something that we feel we want to respond to at this time.â€
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
In November
History: This is the location’s second probationary rating since 2014, and has had a mixed history since then. Probationary, needs improvement or failed follow-up inspections outnumber good or excellent ratings. In September it failed two follow-up inspections before finally passing in October.
What the inspector saw: The inspector determined that the “person in charge†does not have “sufficient food safety knowledge due to the number of of out of control risk factors, many of which are repeats of previous violations.†Additionally, the inspector observed raw chicken being handled by someone who did not wash their hands before handling ready-to-eat foods, a handsink without paper towels, inadequate cooling of food, hot foods kept below established temperatures, a walk-in cooler not keeping foods at established temperatures, and food stored without proper date markings.
Follow-up: A follow-up inspection has not yet been conducted.
Response: A message left for a manager was not returned.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
In November
History: This was the restaurant’s first routine health inspection.
What the inspector saw: The inspector found five priority violations, the minimum for a probationary rating. Those included an employee who put on a new pair of gloves without washing his hands, no paper towels at a hand washing sink, recently purchased pans with sticker residue, and a walk-in refrigerator not keeping foods below established temperatures.
Follow-up: A follow-up inspection has not yet been conducted.
Response: Owner Lisa Sopher said that all of the issues were resolved “the first day,†and expects to pass the follow-up inspection scheduled for Dec. 10. “I put my foot down†on kitchen employees about the violations, she added.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
In November
History: Since 2012, the restaurant has received exclusively good and excellent ratings. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw: The inspector found six priority violations, including the absence of a hand washing sink in the bar area, hot food held below established temperatures, other foods kept above established temperatures, inadequate handwashing and flies on uncovered foods. Rodent droppings were also found.
Follow-up: The restaurant passed a Nov. 23 follow-up inspection.
Response: An owner declined to comment.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
In November
History: Since 2014, the restaurant received exclusively good ratings before the Nov. 2 needs improvement rating.
What the inspector saw: The inspector observed three priority violations on Nov. 2, earning the restaurant a needs improvement rating. Those violations were inadequate cooling of food, a walk-in refrigerator failing to keep foods at established temperatures and insufficient consumer advisories for undercooked foods.
Follow-up: The walk-in refrigerator issue had not been resolved by the Nov. 4 follow-up, but was by Nov. 8, when the restaurant passed the inspection.
Response: The Star was unable to contact a manager at either of two numbers listed for the restaurant, and a Facebook message also received no response.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
In November
History: Since 2010, El Herradero has received two other probationary ratings, one needs improvement rating and a number of good and excellent ratings.
What the inspector saw: The inspector found five priority violations, including a hand sink with no soap, food equipment not being washed but not sanitized, hot foods being held below established temperatures, improper date labeling of prepared foods and raw shrimp ceviche without a mandated health advisory.
Follow-up: The location passed a follow-up inspection on Nov. 14.
Response: A message left for the owner was not returned.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
- Updated
4,836: Food service licenses in Pima County
433: Excellent and good inspections
17: Needs improvement inspections
7: Probationary and failed inspectionsÌý
Source: Pima County Health DepartmentÌý
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
From January
History:ÌýSince 2012, the convenience store chain’s location has receivedÌýÌýthree excellent ratings and one needs improvement rating. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector observed seven priority violations, including several problems with hand sinks, food held at potentially unsafe temperatures, and foods without adequate date marking.
Follow-up:ÌýThe location passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 17.
Response:ÌýA Circle K spokeswoman told the Star that all issues have been addressed with store employees and the facilities department.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
From January
History:ÌýSince 2013, the hotel’s restaurant hasÌýÌýreceived inspection ratings of good and excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýOn a follow-up to a previous needs-improvement inspection, the inspector found that while the walk-in refrigerator had been repaired, there were still no consumer advisories in menus, resulting in the failed rating.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 19.
Response:ÌýManager Tim Heim told the Star that “we never really had the fail,†and that the remaining consumer advisory issue was resolved promptly.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
From January
History:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the hotel hasÌýÌýreceived inspection ratings of good and excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýOn a follow-up to a previous needs-improvement inspection, the inspector found that the location still had not obtained sanitizer test strips, resulting in the failed inspection. The other issue, a high-temperature dishwasher being without a proper thermometer, was resolved.
Follow-up:ÌýThe hotel passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 19.
Response:ÌýA message left for the manager was not returned by press time.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
From January
History:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the restaurant hasÌýÌýreceived inspection ratings of good and excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector observed seven priority violations, including an employee handling raw beef and then handling ready-to-eat food before washingÌýhis or her hands, chicken kept at unsafe temperatures, no date marking on some foods, and no food thermometer on the premises.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 24.
Response:ÌýThe restaurant could not be reached at the number available online.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
From January
History:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the theater has received ratings of excellent almost exclusively, though it has received one previous needs improvement and two good ratings.
What the inspector saw:ÌýDuring the Jan. 18 inspection, the inspector found two priority violations, including the absence of a required hand sink in the dish washing area. That issue had not been resolved by the follow-up inspection on Jan. 30, resulting in the failed inspection. The report notes that a plumber has been hired for the work.
Follow-up:ÌýA follow-up is scheduled for Feb. 9.
Response:ÌýAn employee told the Star that a manager would not be available until after press time.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
From January
History:ÌýSince 2012, the charter school has exclusively received inspection ratings of excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýDuring a Dec. 12 inspection, the inspector found that the steam-table unit was not keeping foods adequately heated and there was no food thermometer on the premises. During a follow-up nearly a month later, the inspector found that the steam table had not been repaired and only one of five slots was functioning properly, and no food thermometer had been acquired, resulting in the failed rating.
Follow-up:ÌýThe school passed a follow-up inspection on Jan. 17.
Response:ÌýPrincipal Paul Bummer said that staff had initially tried to fix the steamer, whichÌýÌýdid not resolve the issue. The school ended up buying a brand new one, along with a food thermometer. “We take this matter seriously,†Bummer added.
- By Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
The Carondelet St. Joseph’s cafeteria failed a recent health inspection as a result of a faulty refrigerator.
On Jan. 17, a county inspector found that one of several refrigerators at the east side hospital was not keeping foods sufficiently cool. Normally, five priority violations are required to receive a failing “probationary†rating, but in this case the inspector pointed to the cafeteria’s “pattern of non-compliance†in its report.
That means the county has found at least three instances of comparable violations in recent inspections.
The refrigerator in question was removed from service and “all other areas surveyed during this inspection were found to be rated good or excellent,†according to a statement provided by a Carondelet spokeswoman.
“Carondelet St. Joseph’s Hospital takes every effort to ensure quality and safety in all aspects of the care and service that is provided,†the statement read.
It has since passed re-inspection.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
4,836 - Food service licenses in Pima County
561 - Excellent and good inspections
26 - Needs improvement inspections
7 - Probationary and failed inspections
Source: Pima County Health Department
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
From December
History:ÌýSince 2000, the chain’s location has received almostÌýonly good and excellent inspection ratings. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýWhile the restaurant did not exceed the five priority violation threshold typically used to give probationary ratings, the restaurant has had repeated issues with regulations regarding the cleaning and sanitizing of so-called food contact surfaces. This time around, the inspector found that aÌýÌýmajorityÌýof kitchenwares stored as clean were “encrusted with food debris†and that the sanitizing dishwasher was not functioning properly. In the location’s past five inspections, there have been three comparable violations, establishing what the health department considers aÌýpattern of non-conformance,Ìýaccording to an inspection report provided to the Star. Additionally, the inspector observed an employee “eating a piece of food off of a customer’s order before putting the order up to be collected by wait staff,†another “handling raw hamburger†before touching ready-to-eat foods, and raw chicken thawing at room temperature on a countertop.
Follow-up:ÌýThere was no indication that a follow-up had been conducted by the Star’s deadline.
Response:ÌýIn written comments provided to the Star, a company spokesperson said that “The health of our guests and team members is always our top priority. We have put together a corrective and preventative action plan and are working closely with the health department to ensure all concerns are addressed.â€
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
ÌýIn December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince 2014, this location has received one excellent and three good inspection ratings. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector found six priority violations, including an ice shaver being stored and used on the “dirty side†of a three compartment sink, food preparation equipment with encrusted food debris, condensed milk stored at room temperature, no food thermometer on site and medicine stored near food preparation areas. Several were corrected on site.
Follow-up:ÌýThe location passed a Dec. 20 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýNo one responded to a message seeking comment by deadline.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
ÌýIn December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the location hasÌýÌýreceived inspection ratings of good or excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector observed nine priority violations, including picking up utensils from the floor and returning to food preparation without washing hands, among other hand-washing violations; using hand-washing sink for cooking water and washing floor mats; refried beans kept above safe temperatures and an inadequate dishwashing sink.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant passed a Dec. 22 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýNo one responded to a message seeking comment by deadline.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
ÌýIn December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince 2011 the restaurant has largely received inspection ratings of good, though it has also failed an additional inspection and received two needs improvement ratings.
What the inspector saw:ÌýOnly one priority violation was observed, but because the same problem with keeping foods adequately cooled was found during two other 2016 inspections, the restaurant received a probationary rating for itsÌýhistory of noncompliance,Ìýaccording to the inspection report.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant failed a Dec. 27 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýNo one responded to a message seeking comment by deadline.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
In December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince 2015, the restaurant has had a mixed record, earning an excellent, good and needs improvement inspection rating. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector observed eight priority violations, including an employee washing his hands in the food-preparation sink, an employee sweeping the floor and then proceeding to chop cabbage without washing his hands, equipment with encrusted food debris stored as clean, inadequate cooling and date-marking of food and chopped cabbage being stored inÌýdirty cardboard boxes.
Follow-up:ÌýThe restaurant passed a Dec. 30 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýNo one responded to a message seeking comment by deadline.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
ÌýIn December
ÌýHistory:ÌýSince the early 2000s, the location hasÌýÌýreceived ratings of good and excellent. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw:ÌýThe inspector found five priority violations, including a hand-washing station with no paper towels, a walk-in cooler not keeping contents adequately cooled, no food thermometer on site, and inadequate coffee pot cleaning practices.
Follow-up:ÌýThe station passed a Jan. 3 follow-up inspection.
Response:ÌýIn an email, a spokesperson for Circle K, the permit holder, told the Star: “This is not something that we feel we want to respond to at this time.â€
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
In November
History: This is the location’s second probationary rating since 2014, and has had a mixed history since then. Probationary, needs improvement or failed follow-up inspections outnumber good or excellent ratings. In September it failed two follow-up inspections before finally passing in October.
What the inspector saw: The inspector determined that the “person in charge†does not have “sufficient food safety knowledge due to the number of of out of control risk factors, many of which are repeats of previous violations.†Additionally, the inspector observed raw chicken being handled by someone who did not wash their hands before handling ready-to-eat foods, a handsink without paper towels, inadequate cooling of food, hot foods kept below established temperatures, a walk-in cooler not keeping foods at established temperatures, and food stored without proper date markings.
Follow-up: A follow-up inspection has not yet been conducted.
Response: A message left for a manager was not returned.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
In November
History: This was the restaurant’s first routine health inspection.
What the inspector saw: The inspector found five priority violations, the minimum for a probationary rating. Those included an employee who put on a new pair of gloves without washing his hands, no paper towels at a hand washing sink, recently purchased pans with sticker residue, and a walk-in refrigerator not keeping foods below established temperatures.
Follow-up: A follow-up inspection has not yet been conducted.
Response: Owner Lisa Sopher said that all of the issues were resolved “the first day,†and expects to pass the follow-up inspection scheduled for Dec. 10. “I put my foot down†on kitchen employees about the violations, she added.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
In November
History: Since 2012, the restaurant has received exclusively good and excellent ratings. This was its first failed inspection.
What the inspector saw: The inspector found six priority violations, including the absence of a hand washing sink in the bar area, hot food held below established temperatures, other foods kept above established temperatures, inadequate handwashing and flies on uncovered foods. Rodent droppings were also found.
Follow-up: The restaurant passed a Nov. 23 follow-up inspection.
Response: An owner declined to comment.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
In November
History: Since 2014, the restaurant received exclusively good ratings before the Nov. 2 needs improvement rating.
What the inspector saw: The inspector observed three priority violations on Nov. 2, earning the restaurant a needs improvement rating. Those violations were inadequate cooling of food, a walk-in refrigerator failing to keep foods at established temperatures and insufficient consumer advisories for undercooked foods.
Follow-up: The walk-in refrigerator issue had not been resolved by the Nov. 4 follow-up, but was by Nov. 8, when the restaurant passed the inspection.
Response: The Star was unable to contact a manager at either of two numbers listed for the restaurant, and a Facebook message also received no response.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
In November
History: Since 2010, El Herradero has received two other probationary ratings, one needs improvement rating and a number of good and excellent ratings.
What the inspector saw: The inspector found five priority violations, including a hand sink with no soap, food equipment not being washed but not sanitized, hot foods being held below established temperatures, improper date labeling of prepared foods and raw shrimp ceviche without a mandated health advisory.
Follow-up: The location passed a follow-up inspection on Nov. 14.
Response: A message left for the owner was not returned.
- Murphy Woodhouse ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥
4,836: Food service licenses in Pima County
433: Excellent and good inspections
17: Needs improvement inspections
7: Probationary and failed inspectionsÌý
Source: Pima County Health DepartmentÌý
As featured on
Owner says boost in minimum wage was the final straw.
The coach met with the media Monday after the Wildcats swept Washington State and Washington.Ìý
More information
- ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥ bakery Le Cave's continues to fail health inspections
- 5 restaurants failed Pima County health inspections in October
- Popular ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥ bakery Le Cave's fails health inspection again
- 5 restaurants fail Pima County health inspections in July after 9 failed in June
- These 22 ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥ restaurants are offering Super Bowl specials
- Marana Hooters closing Sunday; Ina Road work the culprit
- 2 Dickey's BBQ locations in ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥ change name to Jackson's
- Death of 6-month-old girl investigated
- Barriers aren't just for the border now
- Photos: Lance Armstrong, locals take part in 24 Hours in the Old Pueblo race
- Man shot to death on ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥'s south side
- Photos: 2017 ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥ Rodeo action
- Under ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥ bill, police would be able to arrest peaceful protesters to prevent a riot
- Watch: Sean Miller, ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥ Wildcats talk 90-77 win over USC Trojans
- Eight cool things to do in ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥ this weekend (Feb. 24-26)
Start of huge interstate project in ÃÛèÖÖ±²¥ pushed back
