蜜柚直播

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the last-ditch plea by 蜜柚直播 Attorney General Mark Brnovich to uphold a 2012 executive order by then-Gov. Jan Brewer to deny driver鈥檚 licenses to DACA recipients, an order current Gov. Doug Ducey has left in place.

The justices gave no reason for their ruling.

Monday鈥檚 ruling ends years of efforts by 蜜柚直播 to claim that the Obama administration鈥檚 2012 decision to allow those in DACA 鈥� people who arrived in the United States illegally as children 鈥� to remain in the United States and work does not mean they are 鈥渁uthorized鈥� to be here. The program recipients are known as 鈥渄reamers.鈥�

It was shortly after Obama鈥檚 action that Brewer directed the 蜜柚直播 Department of Transportation to deny licenses to DACA recipients. She cited a 1996 蜜柚直播 law that says state licenses are available only to those whose presence in this country is 鈥渁uthorized by federal law.鈥�

Brewer argued that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has no legal authority to permit DACA recipients to remain and work.

That argument failed to convince federal appellate judges, who said 蜜柚直播 cannot decide for itself who is legally entitled to be in the country. In fact, Judge Harry Pregerson wrote that the state policy 鈥渁ppears intended to express animus toward DACA recipients.鈥�

With Monday鈥檚 high court action, that ruling is now final.

At last count, there were about 30,000 DACA recipients in 蜜柚直播. ADOT does not have current figures on how many were issued licenses while the case was pending. The last update, in April 2016, showed more than 21,000 DACA recipients with driver鈥檚 licenses.

Brewer said she was disappointed not only in Monday鈥檚 ruling but also in the fact that the Justice Department, now under the control of Donald Trump, whom she supported for president, asked the Supreme Court to reject 蜜柚直播鈥檚 petition.

鈥淥bviously, they trampled all over the Tenth Amendment,鈥� she said, citing the amendment that says powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution 鈥渁re reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.鈥� She called DACA 鈥渁n illegal Obama executive action that trumped states鈥� rights.鈥�

That essentially was the argument Brnovich made to the high court. He said the Office of Legal Counsel within the U.S. Department of Justice said in its own writing that DACA 鈥渄oes not establish any enforceable legal right to remain in the United States 鈥� and it may be revoked by immigration authorities at their discretion.鈥�

Brewer said Monday鈥檚 ruling leaves two options going forward.

One is for Trump to rescind DACA, something the president has tried to do. But those efforts have so far been blocked by a federal judge. The Supreme Court has declined to intercede, meaning there will be no final decision before at least this fall.

The other, said Brewer, is for Congress to finally address the question, in statute, of whether DACA recipients should be allowed to stay.

That would not only make moot any question of whether they are 鈥渁uthorized鈥� to be here but make it clear that they are entitled to the same rights and privileges, such as licenses, as other legal residents who are not citizens.

Brewer was not optimistic that might happen.

Brnovich echoed some of those sentiments, saying the justices 鈥渟idestepped the underlying issue of whether President Obama had the authority to create DACA.鈥�

鈥淚t鈥檚 up to Congress now to determine how to address DACA policy and whether to provide recipients with a legally sound and lasting solution,鈥� the attorney general said.

Karina Ruiz, executive director of the 蜜柚直播 Dream Act Coalition, which sued to overturn Brewer鈥檚 policy, had a different take.

鈥淒ACA recipients in 蜜柚直播 can declare victory in our fight to end the state鈥檚 malicious attack that spanned six years and two governors and was aimed at stripping us of basic civil rights,鈥� she said.