Attorneys for the University of 蜜柚直播 have denied for the second time that the athletic department claimed to have a zero-tolerance policy regarding domestic violence.
The denial came in a Friday response to an amended federal lawsuit levied against the 蜜柚直播 Board of Regents by a woman who says school officials knew former Wildcats running back Orlando Bradford was abusing women but failed to take appropriate action to protect other students.
Bradford was sentenced to five years in prison in November in connection with choking two women. Both of those women are now suing the school in separate federal lawsuits.
The first lawsuit was filed in October, after which Assistant Attorney General Claudia Acosta Collings 鈥 who is representing the UA in both suits 鈥 filed a response denying nearly all claims, including a portion of the suit that referenced the athletic department鈥檚 鈥渮ero-tolerance鈥 policy toward domestic violence.
People are also reading…
The second lawsuit was filed in January and amended two weeks later to include allegations of a hostile environment in the athletic department that included rampant sexual harassment and assault, including gang rapes by members of the football team. It鈥檚 unclear if any football players were investigated or arrested in connection to the purported rapes.
In the UA鈥檚 response to the second suit, Collings again denied a portion of the suit that referenced fired football coach Rich Rodriguez鈥檚 comments to reporters about how the football team doesn鈥檛 tolerate domestic violence.
Five days after Bradford鈥檚 arrest and subsequent dismissal from the team, Rodriguez told reporters: 鈥淲e have a rule. You put your hands on a woman, you鈥檙e done. That鈥檚 it. If you did it, if you put your hands on a woman in any way, shape or form, you鈥檙e done. Next.鈥
The lawsuit says that school officials also 鈥渇alsely announced that this was Mr. Bradford鈥檚 鈥榝irst鈥 act of domestic violence鈥 but knew that he鈥檇 been investigated by campus police a few months before his arrest, when a third woman complained he鈥檇 been violent with her.
The response repeatedly denies that any UA athletic staff or coaches knew about Bradford鈥檚 abuse of any of the three women and says that the school 鈥渆xercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct any sexually harassing behavior鈥 and that the woman 鈥渇ailed to take advantage of preventative opportunities or to otherwise avoid harm.鈥
The response says the woman鈥檚 鈥渋njuries and damages, if any鈥 were her fault, and the fault of parties who have not been named in the suit, adding that Bradford is a non-party at fault in the case.
Both the UA and the woman who filed the suit have requested a jury trial.
For details about the most recent federal lawsuit, visit tucne.ws/uhj and tucne.ws/uhm.
